Skip to content

1-2-1: Reactivity is expensive

Liam Darmody
Liam Darmody
— 1 min read

Every reactive message I've seen dissected in coaching has the same profile: the content was fine, the timing and tone caused the damage.

The email fired off hot. The escalation in the meeting. The response shaped by a stakeholder's tone. And then the cleanup that takes weeks.


1 Principle

The space between trigger and response is where your judgement lives.

Every reactive decision has a cleanup cost. The problem is you don't see the invoice until weeks later, when someone stops speaking up in your meetings, or a peer routes around you instead of coming to you directly. The decision itself might have been fine. The way it was delivered under pressure is what caused the damage.


2 Things Top of Mind

#1 The reaction takes seconds. The repair takes weeks.

It usually looks like this. Something breaks: a deployment, a stakeholder relationship, a sprint commitment. Someone says something that gets under your skin. You respond in the moment. The Slack message, the sharp comment in the retro, the escalation email cc'ing someone who didn't need to be there. And then the cleanup. The follow-up DM. The "I didn't mean it like that." The trust that takes months to rebuild. The pattern is always the same.

This week: Before you send your next high-stakes message, write one sentence first: "The outcome I want from this is..." If you can't write it, wait.

#2 Calm is a leadership skill, not a personality trait

The leaders I work with who handle pressure well aren't the ones who don't feel it. They're the ones who've practised the pause often enough that it's become automatic. One engineering director I coach keeps a sticky note on his monitor that says "What's the outcome?" He told me it's saved him from at least five bad emails. It's not about temperament. It's about having a system that catches you before you react.

This week: Pick your most common pressure trigger. The recurring meeting, the stakeholder, the type of message. Write down one sentence you'll say to yourself when it next happens: "I'll respond to this in the morning." Put it where you'll see it.


1 Question

What would change if you responded to pressure two hours later than you usually do?


1-2-1

Liam Darmody

I’m a leadership coach and product advisor. I work with senior product and engineering leaders during periods of transition and growth, helping them regain clarity, align teams, and perform sustainably under pressure.


Related Posts

Members Public

1-2-1: Time saved is the wrong number

A sentence I keep hearing from founders this year is "I need two more people and I can't afford them." You've probably tried to close a gap like that with AI. You may have a number for how much time it saves each week.

Members Public

1-2-1: Month six is the real test

I found out this week that my own AI team has been making recommendations off numbers that stopped being true in February. Nothing was broken. Everything was running. That was the problem. 1 Principle Systems don't fail at launch. They fail around month six, when the novelty ends

Members Public

1-2-1: AI amplifies whatever you point it at

Every team that's struggled to make AI useful has the same upstream problem: they weren't aligned on what they were doing before AI got there. You can't outsource alignment to a tool. 1 Principle Applied to a clear team, AI multiplies clarity. Applied to